Answer:
show that the wartime goals of the U.S. Cavalry and the Kiowas were fundamentally different.
Explanation:
The language in this sentence suggests that the author wants to "show that the wartime goals of the U.S. Cavalry and the Kiowas were fundamentally different."
For the Kiowas, they fought as a result of their expertise as good warriors. They fought out of their character and nature to fight and not because of the material gains they will get as a means of survival. Whereas, the U.S. Cavalry were somewhat different as they kept pushing forward even at a time when there is no war.
Answer:
1. Hit it off (made it work)
2. Catch up (find out what someone has been doing)
3. Pick on (Make fun of, bully, abuse, mock)
The conflict can be called different things, but it should be something like vs. nature, vs. environment, vs. external even.
Answer:
ok then, not sure why you know what the answer is and still posted the quesiton
Explanation:
To quote dictionary.com, "shrew<span>. Use the noun </span>shrew<span> — at your own risk — to refer to a woman who is argumentative, nagging, and ill tempered."
Termagant's definition is "</span><span>a harsh-tempered or overbearing woman."</span>