1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
15

Suppose you have this array of five integers: int[] list {2, 5, 4, 8, 3}. if a bubble sort is being used, which index of the arr

ay will the number 8 be in after the first pass through the algorithm?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Gwar [14]3 years ago
8 0
Array list: ⇒ <span>2, 5, 4, 8, 3

</span>Sort the array from lowest number to greatest number using bubble sort.

First pass:
2 , 5 , 4 , 8 , 3 
2 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 3 ⇒⇒⇒ Swap since 5 > 4
2 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 3
2 , 4 , 5 , 3 , 8 ⇒⇒⇒ Swap since 8 > 3

∴ The index of the number 8 <span>after the first pass = 5</span>




You might be interested in
Tarik filled his tank with 11 gallons of
kompoz [17]
I think the answer is he payed $3.40
3 0
2 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
What is the vaule of 0.77
padilas [110]
<span>seventy-seven hundredths.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Draw the angle given in degrees on the unit circle where 0 radians corresponds to the positive portion of the horizontal axis: 2
vivado [14]
Ur answer will c as I Claus
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz answer!! only if you are correct. don’t answer just for points :)
Ann [662]

Answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Both 1 and 2 equel up to 90 degrees

so to find x for 1 and 2 you would simplify the equations

90 = 6x - 3

and

90= 3x - 6

simplify them and you wil get the answers you want

another way to do it is combining the two and solve.

90 = 9x - 9  

Just simplify :)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A light-rail service claims to be on time 98% of the time. If Jeanette takes the light-rail 40 times one mouth, how many times c
    10·1 answer
  • Evaluate the expression below. 20 – ||–13| + 17|
    14·2 answers
  • What are the next two terms in the pattern 3,6,5,10,9,18,17
    13·1 answer
  • Whats's the difference between -6 and 6 on the number line?
    13·2 answers
  • The table below shows the future value of a certificate of deposit (CD) after x years Eric states the applied interest is simple
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIEST
    6·2 answers
  • What is the volume 9inches 3inches 5inches
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this?
    13·1 answer
  • Write an equation in slope intercept form with the slope as 1/3 and the point (-3,4)
    13·1 answer
  • The length of the base of an isosceles triangle is x. The length of a leg is 4x - 7. The perimeter of the triangle is 31. Find x
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!