1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
3 years ago
5

name a movie that is just like (has to have a seasons) gilmore girls 50 points each and brainliest for best answer :)

History
1 answer:
meriva3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

cs188 The freedum phone

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which winning presidential candidate received the fewest number of
cluponka [151]

Answer: Donald Trump 2016.

Explanation:Of the 58 presidential elections in the history of the United States, 53 of the winners took both the Electoral College and the popular vote. But in five incredibly close elections—including those for two of the past three presidents—the winner of the Electoral College was in fact the loser of the popular vote.

Here's how that can happen: The U.S. president and vice president aren’t elected by direct popular vote. Instead, Article II, section I of the Constitution provides for the indirect election of the nation’s highest offices by a group of state-appointed “electors.” Collectively, this group is known as the Electoral College.To win a modern presidential election, a candidate needs to capture 270 of the 538 total electoral votes. States are allotted electoral votes based on the number of representatives they have in the House plus their two senators. Electors are apportioned according to the population of each state, but even the least populous states are constitutionally guaranteed a minimum of three electors (one representative and two senators).

This guaranteed minimum means that states with smaller populations end up having greater representation in the Electoral College per capita. Wyoming, for example, has one House representative for all of its roughly 570,000 residents. California, a much more populous state, has 53 representatives in the House, but each of those congressmen and women represent more than 700,000 Californians.

Since most states (48 plus Washington, D.C.) award all of their electoral votes to the person who wins the statewide popular vote, it’s mathematically possible to win more electoral votes while still losing the popular vote. For example, if one candidate wins by large percentages in a handful of very populous states, for example, they’ll probably win the popular vote. But if their opponent wins a bunch of smaller states by tight margins, he or she could still win the Electoral College. That’s basically what happened in 2016.

Take a look at all five times a president won the White House while losing the popular vote.

This is the first of two occasions when the man ultimately elected president first lost both the popular vote and the electoral vote.

Back in 1824, there were four contenders for the presidency, all members of the same Democratic-Republican party: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford and Henry Clay.

When the votes were tallied, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of both the popular vote and the Electoral College. But to win the presidency, you need more than a plurality (the most electoral votes), you need a majority (more than half), and Jackson was 32 electoral votes shy of the mark.

4 0
3 years ago
Can someone put these three words in a paragraph
stiks02 [169]
When the country mobilized it’s troops, it gave the illusion it was going to attack it’s neighboring country. This caused an evacuation of that country.
7 0
2 years ago
Please help asap!! i beg!!
Kamila [148]
They were trying to civilize them, trying to convert them to Christianity—— this was the concept of social Darwinism, that Europeans had to “civilize” Africans from their barbarous ways
6 0
3 years ago
What is NOT promised by democracy?
Mandarinka [93]

Answer: what is promised by democracy is that the people should rule. so i guess it is the opposite. no one can rule for the people?

Explanation:

i dont know im sorry i i didnt help

3 0
2 years ago
In the declearation of independance thomas jefferson argued that indivuals had the right to do
aev [14]

Answer:

In his first two paragraphs, he contended that a people had the right to remove their government if it repeatedly violated their fundamental inherent rights. Then, in a frontal attack on King George, Jefferson cited 20 instances in which the king had infringed on American colonists' liberties.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match the correct definition with the term. 1.Whose campaign had ads that were simple and to-the-point? 2.Whose ad focused on ap
    6·1 answer
  • Can u guys plz help me with this <br>6(2x+4)=3(4x+8)​
    15·2 answers
  • How did the haitian revolution of 1791-1804 affect white americans?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the incorporation of the bill of rights?
    10·2 answers
  • Who among the Greek philosophers would be the most influential until modern times?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the partition of India into different countries in 1947 lead to violence?
    7·1 answer
  • Cesar Chavez created the United Farm Workers (UFW) in 1966 primarily to a secure voting right for Mexican Americans. b improve w
    9·1 answer
  • Is the church powerful?
    12·1 answer
  • When did cats become pets
    6·2 answers
  • Charles the first was the king of in 1625
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!