Answer: $25
Explanation:
Value with no growth = Expected earnings/Market capitalization rate
= $5/10%
= $5/0.1
= $50
Growth rate = Earnings retention ratio × ROE
Growth rate = 40% × 15%
= 40/100 × 15/100
= 0.4 × 0.15
= 0.06 = 6%
Value with growth = [$5 × (1-0.4)]/(0.10 - 0.06)
= ($5 × 0.6)/0.04
= $3/0.04
= $75
Present value of growth opportunities will now be:
= Value with growth - value with no growth
= $75 - $50
= $25
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Price index in the year 2004 = 110
Price index in the year 2005 = 120
Price index in the year 2006 = 125
Inflation rate refers to the rate at which the prices of goods increases from one year to the other.
Consumer price index indicates the inflation in a particular year.
Inflation between 2004 and 2005:
= (Price index in the year 2005 - Price index in the year 2004) ÷ Price index in the year 2004
= (120 - 110) ÷ 110
= 10 ÷ 110
= 0.0909 or 9.09%
Inflation between 2005 and 2006:
= (Price index in the year 2006 - Price index in the year 2005) ÷ Price index in the year 2005
= (125 - 120) ÷ 120
= 5 ÷ 120
= 0.0417 or 4.17%
Therefore, the inflation between 2004 and 2005 is higher than the inflation between 2005 and 2006.
HubSpot researched open times to find late morning tends to get the most opens. Send emails at 11 a.m. for the best results. Data from MailerMailer also suggests that sending emails in the late morning during work hours gets the best percentage of opens.
Answer:
credit to Work in Process of $59,000.
Explanation:
Based on the information given the appropriate l journal entries to record these transactions would include a: CREDIT TO WORK IN PROCESS OF $59,000
Dr Finished goods $59,000
Cr Work in process $59,000
Dr Cost of goods sold $65,000
Cr Finished goods $65,000
The provision is not enforceable if it is a reasonable estimate of the loss on the breach.
Option - b
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
There are a few solutions for rupture of agreement, for example, grant of harms, explicit execution, rescission, and restitution. In courts of restricted purview, the fundamental cure is an honor of harms.
Since explicit execution and rescission are evenhanded cures that don't fall inside the purview of the officer courts, they are not canvassed in this instructional exercise.
The count of compensatory harms relies upon the kind of agreement that was broken and the sort of misfortune that was caused. Some broad rules are:
Standard measure, The standard proportion of harms is a sum that would permit the no breaching gathering to purchase a substitute for the advantage that would have been gotten if the agreement had been performed.
In situations where the expense of the substitute is theoretical, the no breaching gathering may recoup harms in the measure of the expense caused in playing out that gathering's commitments under the agreement.
