Answer: u need to go to mr.google sir/mam
Step-by-step explanation:
ur mom
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be well written as:


Given that:
n = 200
x = 135
Alpha ∝ = 0.05 level of significance
Then;
⇒ 
= 200 × 0.6 × (1 -0.6)
= 200 × 0.6 × 0.4
= 48 ≥ 10
The sample proportion 

= 0.675
The test statistics 


Z = 2.165
The P-value = P(Z > 2.165)
= 1 - P(Z < 2.165)
From the z tables
= 1 - 0.9848
= 0.0152
Reject the null hypothesis since P-Value is lesser than alpha. ( i.e. 0.0152 < 0.05).
Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that the value of the population proportion is greater than 0.6
Answer:
i think if its on a graph
Step-by-step explanation:
Since 3 is greater than -3, hence (-1, 3) lie in the solution set. Option C is correct
In order to determine the points that lie in the solution set of the inequality y > 3x +10, we will substitute the x-coordinate and see if <u>y is greater than the result.</u>
<u />
For the coordinate point (1, 10)
y > 3(1) +10
y > 13
Since 10 is not greater than 13, hence (1,10) does not lie in the solution set.
For the coordinate point (4, 20)
y > 3(4) +10
y > 22
Since 20 is not greater than 22, hence (4,20) does not lie in the solution set.
For the coordinate point (-1, 3)
y > 3(-1) +10
y > -7
Since 3 is greater than -3, hence (-1, 3) lie in the solution set.
Learn more on inequality here: brainly.com/question/24372553