Couldn’t quite read everything, the writing is very light. But from what I could read, it was correct for the most part. :)
1) false
2)true
3)-1.346
<span>4)<span><span>x=−5</span><span>x=-5</span></span></span>
<span>5)<span>x=3</span></span>
<span>6)x =~ 3.91 </span>
<span>7) x = 162.69 </span>
<span>hope I helped :)</span>
7)
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.
0.3 if a higher number because anytime there is a negative that means the number is below zero. 0.3 is barley above 0. But -0.7 is below zero
Answer:
38,660
Step-by-step explanation:
54 thousands 6 hundreds 12 tens – 15 thousands 8 hundreds 26 tens
54 thousands = 54000
6 hundreds = 600
12 ten = 12*10 = 120
54 thousands 6 hundreds 12 tens = 54000+600+120 = 54720
15 thousands = 15000
8 hundreds = 800
26 tens = 26*10 = 260
15 thousands 8 hundreds 26 tens = 15000+800+260 = 16060
Thus,
54 thousands 6 hundreds 12 tens – 15 thousands 8 hundreds 26 tens
= 54720- 16060 = 38,660 (Answer)