Their ability to grow cash crops, such as cotton, indigo, and tobacco, as being farther south, was warm enough to do so. This allowed them to sell these crops for a high profit , positively impacting the economy, as they were in high demand worldwide.
A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>
You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.
The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:
- New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
- New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.
Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.
We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>
Answer: America has changed over time, for some it could have changed in a bad way or in a good way. Some negatives could be the statistics that show the amount of racist encounters in schools, work places, and in communities. Optimistic views would hold the fact that the United States helps anyone with education, careers, and finances as an examples of a change for the better. Ultimately, the point of view and beliefs of a person as an individual is the most valued answer.
Explanation:
