Answer:
The Court ruled that the ban on affirmative action in the Michigan Constitution is Constitutional.
Explanation:
The Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action is a case of affirmation, race and sex discrimination in public university admission.
On the 22nd of April, 2014 the court held that fourteenth Amendment's equal protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmation in education.
According to Justice Scalia, '' Constitution [forbids] government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception''. Justice Scalia believe that the people in Michigan followed the understanding of the clause as their fundamental law.
Other court associate Justice include; Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Badder Ginsburg. The Chief Justice for the case then is John Roberts.
Hey there!
Out of all the options given, the correct answer is C) threat of blackouts.
Hope this helped you! (:
The correct answer here would be D.
The Kellogg-Briand Pact in an international agreement signed by 64 nations which through it renounced war and agreed not to use it to solve disputes. The disputes were to be settled peacefully. It was signed in 1928 and had little effect, mainly because the League of Nations was enable to enforce it due to lack of authority and the absence of US. So the correct answer is D.
According to Erikson’s theory, the correct answer that holds
true for most toddlers is that they want to gain a sense of control over their
own bodies. It is because the theory focuses more on an individual from being a
toddler to late adult hood that emphasizes how they develop and mature by overcoming
certain obstacles in life, to adjust well in the environment and as well as
knowing one’s identity such as his or her capabilities, what the person describes
his or herself and his or her aspirations in life.
Answer:
Everyone can communicate with one another through the medium of music because it transcends language barriers. Because of this, it has become one of the things that has the most power over people and has the most influence on their lives.
Parents in every part of the world are of the opinion that music should be regulated for a variety of reasons. One of the arguments is that restricting certain forms of music will lead to a decrease in the number of people attempting s_icide. This is due to the fact that there are a significant amount of songs that discuss someone committing s_icide or hurting others. Music ought to be risk-free.
People think that music should be regulated for a variety of reasons, one of which is the belief that doing so will minimise the amount of exposure to drvg use and s3xual content. People can be seen engaging in s3xual activity as well as drvg use in many of the music videos that go viral. Therefore, individuals assume that prohibiting these types of songs will lessen their likelihood of being exposed to these acts.
Some people feel that music will improve as a result of laws that prohibit the performance of particular types of music.
Explanation:
it's over around 200 words, i believe, and you can change it up to your liking. consider this to be a prompt. you're welcome.
