Answer:
Width: 9 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
1. We can see that the height increased by 6 inches, provided a difference of 15 and 9. If the question states that the frame's dimensions were proportionately enlarged, perhaps the height's enlargment could be benificial
2. If we were to take a ratio where the increased height is over the previous height (height enlargment/prior height) that would be 6/9, or in other words, can be simplified to be 2/3
3. We can see that if the width were to be enlarged, we might be able to determine how much it should be enlarged through a proportionality, provided <em>the frame's dimensions are proportionately enlarged.</em> Now if x ⇒ the width enlargment: 2 / 3 = x / 5.4
4. Through cross multiplication, let us solve for x:
2 * 5.4 = 3 * x,
10.8 = 3 * x,
x = <em>3.6 inches by which the width should be enlarged</em>
5. If we are to determine the new width of the frame after enlargment, add <em>5.4 to 3.6 ⇒ the width of the frame ⇒ 9 inches</em>
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
The values will increase because the multiplier is greater than 1 (1.05).
Answer:
<h2>x = 3 and x = 4 → (3, 0) and (4, 0)</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Part B is saying to equal the both equations, so
5x + 2 = 5x + 5
Take a look, we have the same multiplicative to our variable, but we have different sums, so, if we just say x = 0 we wil have:
5.0 + 2 = 5.0 + 5
0 + 2 = 0 + 5
2 = 5
And of course it's not true, 2 will never be equal to 5, so we can say there's no solution for x.
Another way to see this is:
5x + 2 = 5x + 5
5x - 5x = 5 - 2
0 = 3
0 of couse isn't equal to 3.
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
it has the same a prime bundle
