Assuming that the purpose of the question is to write a play to portray the importance of cultural diversity in a school, it is necessary to structure the text in a narrative format, where there is a plot and different characters.
<h3>What is a narrative</h3>
It is the exposition of facts, a tale or a story, which develops from a plot, where there is a specific time and space and well-built characters, which will be exposed through the narrator, who will be the voice of the text.
If the imagined story portrays a situation of prejudice suffered by an immigrant student, you can build your narrative supported by the cultural characteristics of the character, the place where the situation occurred, by whom, etc.
It is essential, therefore, that when writing a story the author uses ways to retain the reader's attention, through descriptive and sensorial language that helps in the imagination and gives emotion to the text.
Find out more information about narrative here:
brainly.com/question/5012638
Answer:
the first to broach the idea of human beings having created gods were a number of old testament jewish prophets from the eighth century BC onwards. why has their role here been overlooked? perhaps it is because it was assumed that a serious critique of religion could only arise from outside a religious perspective.
Explanation:
im not entirely sure but i did some research and this is what i came up with i hope it helps :)
you can justify your answer by giving backup evidence, imagine a factory opened, and you have to write about it, and nobody else beleives you that it opened. you find a newspaer with the factory opening and thats how you justify
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]
Explanation:
members of Congress reflect the will of the people, or should they pay attention to their own points of ... How should he or she vote
