All categories

2 years ago

If pie is round then does that mean its also pi(3.14)

Mathematics

2 answers:

nalin [4]2 years ago

8 0

Pie is completely unrelated to the math term of pi, so whether it is round or not is irrelevant.

If the term pi is asked to be rounded however, you would in theory use 3.14 for the rounded version of π (3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105)

Papessa [141]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

no because if your talking about like pumpkin pie or apple pie the the pie or pie tin has a circumference when pi 3.14 is an ongoing number.

You might be interested in

Which shows 2^-2 * 2^6 in exponential form

kompoz [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2^-2=0.25

2^6=64

times

=16

5 0

2 years ago

By switching service providers , a family's telephone bill decreased from about $ 50 a month to about 44 . What was the percent

anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

12% decrease

Step-by-step explanation:

50 - 44 = 6

6/50 = 0.12 or 12% decrease

6 0

2 years ago

What is the solution of the equation below?<br> x² - 4= - 5

madam [21]

Answer:

Not possible to work out

Step-by-step explanation:

NO Explanation can be explained as this question cannot be solved

8 0

2 years ago

Brainest for best answer only 5 mins left show your work

Kamila [148]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Problem One

Perimeter is in meters not square meters. The equation is

2*(6.8+x) + 2*12.5= 47 Remove the brackets. Combine like terms

13.6 + 2x + 25 = 47

38.6 + 2x = 47 Subtract 38.5 from both sides

2x = 47 - 38.6

2x = 8.4 Divide by 2

x = 4.2

Answer D

Problem 2

This problem is asking that you calculate the perimeter of a swimming pool.

The two semicircles on the ends make a whole circle.

The diameter of the semicircles is obtained from the difference of the two given lengths.

The rectangle has a length of 12. The length of the rectangle and the 2 semicircles is 16. The difference is 4. You could divide this by 2 to get the radius. I would just leave it as the diameter.

So the perimeter is pi*d + 2 * 12 [there are 2 lengths]

Perimeter = 4*pi + 24

Perimeter = 12.56 + 24

Perimeter = 36.56

Answer A

Problem 3

This is the circle inside the square.

The radius of the circle = 9

The diameter of the circle and the length of square's side = 2*9 = 18

The area of the square = s^2 where s = 18

The area of the square = 18^2 = 324

The area of the circle = pi * 9^2 = 3.24 * 81 = 251.34

The area of the Shaded area = 324 - 251.34 = 69.66

Answer C

Problem 4

b1 = 5

b2 = 11.5

h = 4.5

Formula

Area = (b1 + b2 ) * 4.5/2

Area = (5 + 11.5) * 4.5 /2

Area = 16.5 * 4.5 / 2

Area = 74.25/2

Area = 37.125

Answer D

5 0

2 years ago

a math teacher claims that she has developed a review course that increases the score of students on the math portion of a colle

madam [21]

Answer:

$H_0: \mu\leq514\\\\H_1: \mu>514$

B. Z=2.255. P=0.01207.

C. Although it is not big difference, it is an improvement that has evidence. The scores are expected to be higher in average than without the review course.

D. P(z>0.94)=0.1736

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>A. state the null and alternative hypotheses.</em>

The null hypothesis states that the review course has no effect, so the scores are still the same. The alternative hypothesis states that the review course increase the score.

$H_0: \mu\leq514\\\\H_1: \mu>514$

B. test the hypothesis at the a=.10 level of confidence. is a mean math score of 520 significantly higher than 514? find the test statistic, find P-value. is the sample statistic significantly higher?

The test statistic Z can be calculated as

$Z=\frac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{N}} =\frac{520-514}{119/\sqrt{2000}}=\frac{6}{2.661}=2.255$

The P-value of z=2.255 is P=0.01207.

The P-value is smaller than the significance level, so the effect is significant. The null hypothesis is rejected.

Then we can conclude that the score of 520 is significantly higher than 514, in this case, specially because the big sample size.

C. do you think that a mean math score of 520 vs 514 will affect the decision of a school admissions adminstrator? in other words does the increase in the score have any practical significance?

Although it is not big difference, it is an improvement that has evidence. The scores are expected to be higher in average than without the review course.

D. test the hypothesis at the a=.10 level of confidence with n=350 students. assume that the sample mean is still 520 and the sample standard deviation is still 119. is a sample mean of 520 significantly more than 514? find test statistic, find p value, is the sample mean statisically significantly higher? what do you conclude about the impact of large samples on the p-value?

In this case, the z-value is

$Z=\frac{520-514}{s/\sqrt{n}} =\frac{6}{119/\sqrt{350}} =\frac{6}{6.36} =0.94\\\\P(z>0.94)=0.1736>\alpha$

In this case, the P-value is greater than the significance level, so there is no evidence that the review course is increasing the scores.

The sample size gives robustness to the results of the sample. A large sample is more representative of the population than a smaller sample. A little difference, as 520 from 514, but in a big sample leads to a more strong evidence of a change in the mean score.

Large samples give more extreme values of z, so P-values that are smaller and therefore tend to be smaller than the significance level.

8 0

2 years ago