Answer: the defendant used the trade secret without the plaintiff's permission.
Explanation: In other to stop a competitor from using a trade secret, the plaintiff must prove that a trade secret actually existed, that the defendant acquired the trade secret unlawfully and the defendant used the trade secret without the plaintiff's permission. In other words, you must be able to prove that a trade secret actually exist and your competitor unlawfully acquired it for his or her own interest.
Answer:
c) random assignment.
Explanation:
Random assignment -
It refers to the method used for the experimentation purpose , where in a very haphazard manner the task is distributed to the group of objects , participants , human or animal , is referred to as random assignment .
This enables to have a fair participation of all the subjects .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct option is c) random assignment .
Answer: (of a person or animal) search widely for food or provisions.
Explanation: hope it helps
According to the information in the fragment, it can be inferred that the study was testing the facial feedback hypothesis (option A).
<h3>What is the facial fedback hypothesis?</h3>
The raised facial feedback hypothesis is a proposal by the American psychologist Silvan Tomkins in 1962. In it he argues that the activation of some facial muscles sends sensory information to the brain and an emotional experience is then induced in the subject.
According to the above, the frown and the smile are facial aspects that influence the receiver's perception to establish a conclusion about the cartoons. So the correct answer is option A.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:
Facial feedback hypothesis
Nonverbal hypothesis
Cognitive-mediational theory
Two-factor theory of emotion
Learn more about facial feedback hypothesis in: brainly.com/question/11382779
#SPJ1
