It's email on apex just got it right
Answer:
The government agency is providing basic and/or essential services that further deepen the interests of members of the public
Explanation:
The assertion that a firm with a monopoly power loses it freedom of contract is very true. Monopolies by its realities come with features that ultimately cater for the interests of the firm, instead of the consumers. One of these is charging an astronomical high price on a particular item of commodity, and not taking cognizance of the purchasing power of the public. A firm could to this, and ultimately get away because its the only delivering such services - the one with the enormous monopoly power. Here, there is no stiff competition among goods that may offer liberty of choices to ordinary consumers.
To mitigate these numerous power of monopolies, governmental body has been giving the power to regulate and maintain an oversight functions. They now determine the provisions of contracts. The main objective of government agency, thus, is to ensure a firm with a monopoly power considers the basic and essential interests of the members of the public - the end users. Here, members of the public are insulated from unnecesary exploitation by the monopolies.
Answer:
communication costs
Explanation:
Communication is critical for the success of a business. If the communication cost is high, then communication can become a hindrance to the success of business success. The costs associated with communication include fixed telephone, mobile phones cost, and internet access. Travel and venue cost that facilitates face-face meeting also adds to communication costs.
Businesses are embracing modern technology to cut down on their communication cost. Technology has increased the flow of internal and external communication. Magnet Dot is likely to grow as a business as customers can order for products over the internet.
Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
