Answer:
the inverse for each relation:
1. {(1,-2), (2, 3),(3, -3),(4, 2)} is
<u>{</u><u>(</u><u>-</u><u>2</u><u>,</u><u>1</u><u>)</u><u>,</u><u>(</u><u>3</u><u>,</u><u>2</u><u>)</u><u>,</u><u>(</u><u>-</u><u>3</u><u>,</u><u>3</u><u>)</u><u>,</u><u>(</u><u>2</u><u>,</u><u>4</u><u>)</u><u>}</u><u>.</u>
The direct variation equation is:
d=kt
where d is the distance that the giraffe travels
k is the constant of variation
and t is time
Now we are told that the giraffe can travel 800 ft in 20 seconds, so we can solve for the constant of variation (k)
800=k(20) divide both sides by 20
k=40-------------and the units are ft per sec
So now we can write
d=40t
ck
d=40t
800ft=40*20 ft
800 ft= 800 ft
Hope this helps!
Answer:
90 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
There's more than one way in which to do this. I have chosen to convert '180 minutes' to '3 hours.'
Since distance = rate times time, we have here:
distance traveled in 180 minutes = (30 mph)(3 hr) = 90 miles
The average income for the household that is surveyed should represent the sample data is not relevant.
The information that should be considered as follows:
- The level of the income of the household represents the parameter of the population.
- The total income for the household that is surveyed represents the statistics of the sample.
- The household i.e. surveyed is relevant for the sample of the total population that lives in the zip code.
Therefore we can conclude that the average income for the household that is surveyed should represent the sample data is not relevant.
Learn more about the income here: brainly.com/question/14732695
