3 years ago

Someone help me with these 2 questions asap!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

ddd [48]3 years ago

5 0

Step-by-step explanation:

we would have needed only one corresponding side length. because for similar triangles all corresponding lines (like sides but also heights and so on) would be related in size by using the same scaling factor.

going from the large to the small triangle : what do I need to multiply the large side length with to get the small one ?

27 × x = 9

x = 9/27 = 1/3

that is the scale factor.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE ASAP I NEED HELP !!

Alexus [3.1K]

2205.4 is the answer

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jamie cut a rope into thirds. He used two of the pieces to make a swing. He used equal lengths of the leftover rope on four pict

velikii [3]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:3/4

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is 9.68 irrational or rational

castortr0y [4]

Rational because it terminated

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I am a number less than 3000. When you divide me by 32, my remainder is 30. When you divide me by 58, my remainder 44. What numb

yKpoI14uk [10]

Let Q1 and Q2 be the quotients from dividing 32 and 58 respectively.Then 32 Q1 + 30 = 58 Q2 + 4432 Q1 = 58 Q2 + 1416 Q1 = 29 Q2 + 716 Q1 = (16 + 13)Q2 + 716 Q1 = 16 Q2 + 13 Q2 + 716(Q1 - Q2) = 13 Q2 + 7Because Q1 and Q2 are integers, we have to find Q2 whereby 13Q2 + 7 is divisible by 16.After some try-and-error, we get Q2 = 13. That is 13*13 + 7 = 176Therefore, Q1 - Q2 = 11 --> Q1 - 13 = 11 --> Q1 = 2432*24 + 30 = 58*13 + 44 = 798.I am 798

3 0

4 years ago

I need help! Please!!!

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

with what

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers