1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erma4kov [3.2K]
2 years ago
7

Give an example of a country in modern times that abides by the rule of law and a country that does not. What might you expect f

rom a modern country that does not abide by the rule of law?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Troyanec [42]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

AMERICA

Explanation:

For example, we have traffic laws that let us know who has the right of way and we have environmental laws and regulations that tell us what we are allowed to put into the ground, air and water.

You might be interested in
_____ infest both men and women and are generally spread by sexual contact.
Mnenie [13.5K]

"Pthirus pubis" infest both men and women and are generally spread by sexual contact.

The crab louse for the most part is found in the individual's pubic hair. In spite of the fact that the louse can't hop, it can likewise live in different zones of the body that are secured with coarse hair, for example, the eyelashes. People are the main known hosts of this, despite the fact that a somehow related animal categories, Pthirus gorillae, affects gorilla populaces.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the relationship between Kant's principle of universalizability and the principle of humanity? Do the two ever give conf
rusak2 [61]

Answer and Explanation:

Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person

On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done

The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.

5 0
3 years ago
I love horses and want to be a veterinarian
NeTakaya
It depends do you want to be a strictly equine vet or all around large animal vet?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
SOMEONE PLEASE HELP! HISTORY QUESTION, ABOUT WWI!
Luba_88 [7]
What u need help with?
3 0
3 years ago
David wants to buy a new car that costs $23,899, but only has $6,000 in cash. Since the car costs more than the amount of money
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

he is investing money to buy a car

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pennfoster edu login
    12·1 answer
  • What is the definition of the amendment process
    11·1 answer
  • What was the last state to abolish slavery?
    7·1 answer
  • How is abrasion mechanical weathering?
    12·1 answer
  • Naghemeh wants to focus on the emotional, social, vocational, and health-related outcomes of individuals who are considered psyc
    14·1 answer
  • 10 points on chalcolethic age please answer please
    6·1 answer
  • Define interpersonal conflict and intra personal conflict​
    10·1 answer
  • David often finishes his test before anyone else in the class, but he finds that he misses questions for which she knew the corr
    9·2 answers
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    15·2 answers
  • Early psychological perspective concerned with how behavior helps people adapt to their environment.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!