I think that would be B. dreary
Hi!
The statement that best explains this is:
The allusion highlights ideas that relate to the murder of King Hamlet.
We see that in the myth of the Trojan War, Pyrrhus eventually kills Priam (the King of Troy). Pyrrhus was elated to have done this deed, and that to with Priam's wife, Hecuba, beholding the sight. Priam had caused the war that had eventually resulted in he death of Pyrrhus's father, Achilles, and so by killing him, Pyrrhus was successful in avenging his father.
The reason Hamlet alludes as this particular story is to establish that his motive is similar to that of Pyrrhus's in that Hamlet seeks to avenge the death of his father by killing the King, Claudius, in the presence of his own mother, and Claudius's wife, Gertrude.
So just to be clear, the hints at the following roles:
Hamlet as Pyrrhus
Claudius as Priam
Gertrude as Hecuba
There are many biblical figures that the monk doesnt include in his parables like Noah, or Mary...etc
1. Personification. Chimneys do not have legs, nor do they bounce on fours. The act of personifying is to give a non living item human qualities.
2. Metaphor. The sentence is comparing a bridge to an eye without the use of like or as.
3. I’m not sure on this one. Maybe metaphor (glass bowl to a hill).
4. Likely a simile. This sentence is comparing the bride to a fan while using like.
Answer:
it helps because you can get more information. secondary research is research that is already collected. so if you use that information then, when you are writing you will give more information.
Explanation:
