Answer: False
Explanation: The statement in the question describes Stimulus Equivalence.
Contingency Adduction occurs when an individual acquires a new behaviour through conditioning and another contingency adds it to its own range of behaviors.
Stimulus equivalence on the other hand is when more than one different stimuli get the same response. Similar to the response in a situation where conditioning did not take place, although the response is accurate, it has not been reinforced.
The Judicial Branch was created in Article III of the Constitution. C is the correct answer.
The man running for president promised to defend the individual rights of every citizen by passing new laws and keeping taxes low.
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
