Have more cops and there should be a bigger fine so they get afraid to drink and drive.
Answer:
I believe the best answer to be letter D) Therefore, Wilson's argument that technology makes it more difficult for students to concentrate is thoroughly
researched and provides ample supporting evidence.
Explanation:
We can choose the option above through simple elimination. Option A is not a conclusion at all; it seems to present the final argument of the article, which means it's still part of the development. Letter B presents a "weak" personal opinion which could be a conclusion if it weren't based on personal experience instead of on the arguments offered in the article. Letter C looks more like a thesis statement than a conclusion, in the sense that is presents the topic of the article but not what can be concluded from it. Therefore, letter D seems to be the best option. That is the conclusion of a person who read the article, their evaluation of it: that it was well researched and filled with solid evidence.
Answer:
- <u>My singular objective has been to change farming practices so workers are respected. </u>
- <u>My dreams for change came from watching my parents as I was growing up.</u>
Explanation:
Note, a typical summary statement states <u>the main reasons or points </u>from an action or writeup. In the case of the excerpt, among all the listed options, the two statements above make an appropriate summary;
- My singular objective has been to change farming practices so workers are respected.
- My dreams for change came from watching my parents as I was growing up.
An adverb modifies a verb like adjective or another verb it answers the questions when where how and to what extent
