it's 0.4 while it may look like 4% it's actually 40% of 1
Answer:
Radius of the given circle is r = 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given equation of the circle is 
.
Now we need to find the radius of the given circle .
To find that let's compare with the formula of the circle with is 
, where r is the radius.
We get 
take square root of both sides.
Hence radius of the given circle is r = 2.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
B:Convert the fractional part only then add it to the whole number.
C : 9 1/2,3π,92/5,91/10
B : √26,5.5,5.8,31/5
B: -7,20/3, 7.1 ,√51 , 6π
C: -π , -√5 , -3/2,-1.03
You have the correct answer. It is choice A. Nice work.
I prefer using full circles because sometimes the arcs could be too small in measure to not go where you want them to. If you're worried about things getting too cluttered (a legitimate concern), then I recommend drawing everything in pencil and only doing the circles as faint lines you can erase later. Once the construction is complete, you would go over the stuff you want to keep with a darker pencil, pen or marker. You can also use the circle as a way to trace over an arc if needed.
Choice B is false as a full circle can be constructed with a compass. Simply rotate the compass a full 360 degrees. Any arc is a fractional portion of a circle.
Choice C is false for similar reasoning as choice B, and what I mentioned in the paragraph above.
Choice D contradicts choice A, so we can rule it out. Arcs are easier to draw since it takes less time/energy to rotate only a portion of 360 degrees. Also, as mentioned earlier, having many full circles tend to clutter things up.
Answer:
The distributive property is not properly applied to the second polynomial.
Step-by-step explanation:
For whatever reason, it is a common mistake to say that ...
-(a +b +c) = -a +b +c . . . . WRONG!
Rather, it should be ...
-(a +b +c) = -a -b -c . . . . CORRECT
