47. Specialty stores use a wide variety of products in one product category as their key competitive tool.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
- Hey there , ronisha!
Answer:
- Full settlement generally means DISCOUNT ALLOWED.
- Firstly , Read out the question and try to understand. It says we purchased some stuffs of Rs 30000 from the sansee stores and we payed Rs 28000 in full settlement which implies that we received the discount of Rs 30000-28000 i.e Rs 2000.
- You must have known the rules for debit and credit. As we know In case of personal account , Debit : The receiver , We have sansee stores as the receiver so we placed it in debit side.
- Remember: When the question says that the cash is payed through cheque , you should always consider cheque as a bank. Now , In the case of personal account , Credit : The giver. Who's the giver? Of course , bank! So , we placed it in credit side.
- Now , In case of nominal account , Credit : the incomes or gains . The question says we received the discount so obviously it's not expenses. So, We placed discount received in credit side. You must have studied that Every debit should have equal credit. And we're done!
- Hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any questions regarding my answer and also don't hesitate to reach out to me if you need any other help! :)
Answer:
Jacobs will earn $1,080,000
Explanation:
The earnings of the work factor are made up of two factors: Transfer Earnings + Economic Rents.
Transfer earnings are defined as the minimum required amount that a company must pay its workers to keep them in the workplace. Below this amount, the worker will leave his job. In this case, the Transfer Earnings are $ 80,000, which is the base salary of every designer.
On the other hand, the Economic Rents are the additional income that the worker receives and that is above the minimum level they need to supply his work (In this case, the additional income is given by Jacobs' special ability). In numerical terms, the Economics Rents amount is equivalent to the difference between the earnings obtained by the Jacobs company and the earnings obtained by the other companies.
That is: 1,500,000 - 500,000 = 1,000,000.
Therefore Jacobs salary is equivalent to 80,000 + 1,000,000 = 1,080,000.
From this, it can be deduced that approximately 92% of Jacobs' salary is equivalent to Economic Rents. From the theoretical point of view, this makes sense, because the demand for designers (which is a highly qualified profession) is very inelastic, and the more inelastic the greater the proportion of Economic Rents as part of the salary. In the annexes, I show it graphically.
