Momentum is a product mass and velocity. If a certain object posses a kinetic energy, then it should have a momentum since it is moving which has a velocity. However, if the object is at rest and only has potential energy, then it would not have momentum. So, for the first question the answer would be yes, an object can have energy without having any momentum. For the second question, every object whether it is moving or at rest, possess some energy, potential for an object at rest and kinetic for an object that is moving. Thus, the answer would be no, an object having momentum would always have energy.
Answer: the pair of sunglasses
Explanation:
A good pair of sunglasses are composed of abosorbent lenses that filter the sunlight that affects the eyes retina, especially ultraviolet (UV). So, these sunglasses are used to reduce the amount of light or radiant energy transmitted.
On the other hand, normal reading glasses (in which the lens glass has not been treated to filter ultraviolet sunlight) will let UV rays pass through.
Therefore, if both glasses are exposed to sunlight, the sunglasses are expected to be warmer by absorbing that radiant energy and preventing it from reaching the eyes.
Answer:
v = 17.71 m / s
Explanation:
We can work this exercise with the kinematics equations. In general the body is released so that its initial velocity is zero, the acceleration of the acceleration of gravity
v² = v₀² - 2 g (y -y₀)
v² = 0 - 2g (y -y₀)
when it hits the stone the height is zero and part of the height of the seagull I
v² = 2g y₀
v = Ra (2g i)
let's calculate
v =√ (2 9.8 16)
v = 17.71 m / s
Vocabulary should be, I think:
I. Hypothesis
II. Evidence, data
III. Experiment
What is your question exactly?
Not entirely sure if you're saying Homologous , but assuming you do , the homologous chromosomes seperate in the anaphase stage of Mitsosis of the Cell cycle
