Answer:
Explanation:
1. True
Separation of record keeping for assets from custody over assets in custody over assets reduces theft and fraud . except in a case of collusion.
Fraud and theft of assets can be easily perpetrated and covered up when an individual combines the role.
2. False
Internal control focuses more on the internal operation of an organization rather than the external. Even though it can still be of impact in checking the excesses of external parties like the government agencies , but that is not its primary objective
3.True
Internal control's main objectives can be best accomplished when there is an operational system with managerial policies that protect waste , fraud and theft , being the major factors targeted to control
4.False
Separating the responsibility for a transaction between two or more individuals or departments is a major way of preventing creation of fictitious invoices and payment as it could have easily be detected if different individuals are involved in approval and payment of invoices.
Answer:
Required:
Prepare the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet at December 31.
Explanation:
check the file attached for the balance sheet at December 31.
Answer:
the internal rate of return is 6%
Explanation:
The computation of the internal rate of return is shown below;
Given that
Years Cash flows
0 -$20,790
1 $6,000
2 $6,000
3 $6,000
4 $6,000
Now apply the following formula i.e..
= IRR()
After applying the above formula, the internal rate of return is 6%
The increase of the new SUV from $24,000 to $26,000 after the agreement illustrates a low-balling technique.
<h3>What is a low-balling technique?</h3>
This is a tactics used when the persuader gets a person to commit to a low offer that they have no intention of keeping and then, the price is suddenly increased.
Hence, the increase of the new SUV from $24,000 to $26,000 after the agreement illustrates a low-balling technique.
Read more about low-balling technique
<em>brainly.com/question/14565653</em>
#SPJ12
Answer:
A. Competitive markets face perfectly elastic demand and marginal revenue, while monopolies face downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue.
Explanation:
In the case when competitive firms and monopolies generated at the level in which the marginal cost is equivalent to marginal revenue keeping the other things constant so the price should be less in the competitive market as compared to the monopoly because in the competitive markets it face perfectly elastic demand but in the monopoly it face the down ward sloping demand curve
Therefore the option a is correct
