Those who were primarily responsible for the Great Compromise were two delegates from Connecticut, Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth. This was because New Jersey, who had a plan drafted by Paterson, had a small-state plan for representation and Virginia, who was a large state had a different plan and they could not agree to a compromise. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise (because of the delegates who helped to formulate it) was an agreement that all states came to that the lower house would have proportional representation and the upper house would be weighted equally by state.
I think its C. Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady
I hope this helps
"It was invented in 1898" would be the most false statement, since it was actually invented in 1875, but it should be noted that depending on the machine, completely accuracy is not always assured.
<span> The Campbell’s two main claims about what caused the Sepoy rebellion are the following:
</span>-The Sepoy Rebellion occurred cause they thought the british were taking them over.
-Sita was complaining over how the cartridges of fat were causing problems in Oudh.
History is a social science that studies past social and political events. As a discipline, it uses a methodology in order to study historical facts. Facts are objective for every Historian, but when Historians interpret the same facts often they arrive at different conclusions. That is because interpretation is highly subjective and the only way to interpret facts is through some specific perspective, a point of view or paradigm. When Historians interpret some period of History using a theoretical framework, they look at History like looking through glasses that enhance some factors in detriment of others. And that is inevitable when doing the historical interpretation.
Take, for example, Vladimir Lenin and the rise of the Soviet Union. According to Marxism, it was the forces of a social class, the workers, that rose against the imperial Russian state and the bourgeoisie that led to the creation of a Communist state. There are several historical documents that back this point of view. But according to Intentionalism, it was the powerful and attractive personality of Lenin and his talent for politics which led to the fall of the empire and the establishment of a new political system. Again, this is also very well-documented.
Of course, there can also be many other interpretations for this fact. For any historical event, there are many alternate interpretations, each of which looks at different -and many times contradicting- factors of History.
