Answer:
Henry David Thoreau — essayist, poet, philosopher, abolitionist, naturalist, tax resister, development critic, surveyor, and historian — is one of America’s most well-known writers. He lived his entire life, from 1817 until 1862, in and around Concord, Massachusetts, and he remains popular among readers of all ages worldwide because the topics he wrote about are still relevant today. His political writings have inspired generations to take a stand, and his nature writing earned him the title of “the father of environmentalism.”
How much of our life is spent in self-reflection, and how does nature encourage and nurture self-knowledge and growth? Can spending time in nature clear our minds and help us work in a more focused and creative way? Can it make us better learners and better human beings?
In this Text to Text lesson plan, celebrating this year’s 200th anniversary of Thoreau’s birth, we take on some of those questions by pairing his 1851 piece, “Walking,” with a 2013 New York Times column “Time to Write? Go Outside” — then suggest eight activities for taking the learning further.
Explanation:
i really hope this helps im so sorry if it didnt blame the website i went on
Answer:
What is the author's position?
What reasons does the author give to support their position?
Are there any flaws in the author's logic?
Do you agree or disagree with the author's argument or perspective? Why?
What is your position on this topic?
Explanation:
You should also remember these 5 when evaluating.
Authority. Who is the author or creator (who is responsible for the intellectual content) and what are his or her credentials? ...
Accuracy/Quality. Is the information provided specific? ...
Objectivity. ...
Currency. ...
Coverage.
The subject would be owner since the owner is male or female and is a person as well.
1. disheveled (meaning unkempt, messy, hurried, etc)
2. infuriated (mad, angry, ticked, etc)
<span>Ross arrives and announces that Macbeth is to be the new Thane of Cawdor, thus confirming the first prophecy of the Witches. Banquo and Macbeth are struck dumb for the second time, but now Shakespeare contrasts their responses. Banquo is aware of the possibility that the prophecies may have been the work of supernatural dark forces, as exemplified in his lines "What? Can the Devil speak true?" (108) and "oftentimes, to win us to our harm, / The instruments of Darkness tell us truths . . . — (only) to betray us" (123-125). Macbeth is more ambiguous. His speech is full of what will now become his trademark — questioning, doubting, weighing up, and seeking to justify: "This supernatural soliciting / Cannot be ill; cannot be good" (130-131).</span>
