Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
Answer: longer than
Explanation:
The discounted payback period simply refers to the number of years that will be required for the cumulative discounted cash inflows to be able to cover a project's initial investment.
It should be noted that the discounted payback period for a project will be longer than the payback period for the project given a positive, non-zero discount rate. This is because the time value of money will be taken into consideration, hence, this will bring about a longer time.
B
a demand deposit lets you withdraw money without advice notice
Answer:
Entries are given below
Explanation:
DATA:
Opening Balance in the allowance for doubtful debt = $18,100
During 2020 Pharoah company wrote off accounts totaling 12,900
Entry DEBIT CREDIT
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $11,800
Accounts Receivable $11,800
At December 31, 2020, an aging schedule indicated that the balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts should be $23,700
Entry DEBIT CREDIT
Bad debt expense $17,400
Allowance for doubtful debt $17,400
Working
Balance before adjustment = $18,100 - $11,800
Balance before adjustment = $6,300
After Aging schedule indication
Adjustment = $23,700 - 6,300
Adjustment = $17,400
Answer:
Cash flow <em>generated </em>from financing activities 400,000
Cash flow <em>used </em>in Investing activities 7,800,000
Explanation:
700,000 debt receive
-500,000 dividends paid
200,000 other adjustment on Financing
400,000 TOTAL CASH GENERATED
-8,300,000 purchase of PPE
500,000 other adjustment on Inventing
-7,800,000 TOTAL CASH USED
<u>Notice: </u>There is no hint about the adjustment being related as negative, so it should be assuem are positive cashflow.
