Answer:
c) Sally is taxed on the value of the football tickets even if she cannot attend the game.
Explanation:
In this situation Tickets are exchanged for services performed.
This is a payment in-kind. It uses a good or service instead of cash.
It is a form of compensation and so, the employee tax status is that the ticket is taxable income, as the ticket are equivalent to cash in this case.
Answer:
Quarterly deposit= $3,182.78
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A sinking fund earns 7% compounded quarterly and produces $50,000 at the end of 3.5 years.
We need to find the quarterly deposit made at the end of each period.
<u>First, we need to calculate the quarterly interest rate:</u>
Interest rate= 0.07/4= 0.0175
To calculate the deposit, we need to use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= quarterly deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
n= 3.5*4= 14
FV= 50,000
i= 0.0175
A= (50,000*0.0175)/ [(1.0175^14)-1]= $3,182.78
Answer:
Excellent verbal, written, improvisational, and interviewing skills are imperative. Add to those qualities persistence and objectivity, physical stamina, being a team player, projecting a professional image, and having a knowledge of social media. News anchors also need to be able to think on their feet.
Answer:
affect nominal but not real variables. This view that money is ultimately neutral is consistent with classical theory.
Explanation:
This idea is held by classical economists (not by most economists) since they believe in the quantitative theory of money:
MV = PQ
- M = quantity of money
- V = velocity of money
- P = price level
- Q = quantity of goods
Classical theory was abandoned 90 years ago (according to classical theory, recessions were not possible and couldn't exist, but then the Great Depression came and the impossible became true). Neo-classical or monetarists appeared in the 1960s, and lately, neo-neo-classical appeared with George W. Bush. The problem with the quantitative theory is that it needs the following things to be true in order to hold, and empirical evidence over the last 90 years showed that none of them are true:
- the velocity of money has to be constant (AND IT IS NOT CONSTANT)
- real output is independent on money supply (NOT TRUE)
- causation goes from money to prices (MODERN ECONOMISTS BELIEVE IT IS THE OTHER WAY)
