Answer:
Here is the complete question (attachment).
The function which represent the given points are 
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that a general exponential function is like,
We can find the answer by hit and trial method by plugging the values of
coordinates.
Here we are going to solve this with the above general formula.
So as the points are
then for 
Can be arranged in terms of the general equation.
...equation(1) and
...equation(2)

Plugging the values in equation 2.
We have
![\frac{16}{b} b^4=128,16\times b^3=128,b=\sqrt[3]{\frac{128}{16}} =\sqrt[3]{8}=2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B16%7D%7Bb%7D%20b%5E4%3D128%2C16%5Ctimes%20b%5E3%3D128%2Cb%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B128%7D%7B16%7D%7D%20%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B8%7D%3D2)
Plugging
in equation 1.
We have 
Comparing with the general equation of exponential
and 
So the function which depicts the above points =
From theoption we have B as the correct answer.
Answer: C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
To keep it short, refer to triangle exterior angle theorem.
Edit: If you want the full explanation,
A isn't the answer. The triangle exterior angle states that the measure of the 2 triangle interior add up to the the exterior angle of the other interior angle within the triangle.
Meaning that
measure of angle 1 equal the measure of 3 and 4 combined.
B. is wrong they are equal to each other because angle 2 is equal to angle 2
angle 1 is equal to angle 3 and 4
So they are equal
C.Wrong unless it a 30 60 90 triangle or 45 45 90 triangle, C is wrong
D. is right since measure of angle 4 and angle 3 add up to angle 1, angle 4 would be lesser than angle 1.