Answer:
Option A: retro
Explanation:
Difference factors influence consumers to buy certain things. These factors are used to segment consumers. The segmentation is done includes: behavioural, demographic, geographic and psychographic.
Baby boomers fall under the demographic segmentation under the age classification of generations (includes: seniors, baby boomers, generation X and generation Y( college age students).
Today's college age students compose the largest generation. The baby boomer generation is the second largest and over the last thirty years or so, has been a very attractive market for sellers. Retro (old) brands or products that companies "bring back" for a period of time we're aimed at baby boomers during the economic downturn. A perfect example is the Pepsi throwback and Mountain Dew throwback, which are made with cane sugar like they were "back in the good old days" instead of corn syrup.
Therefore, the option that best suits the question is option A, RETRO.
the answer would be about $100
Aggregate supply and demand pertains to how groups of people do business. On the order of Adam Smith's, "Wealth of Nations". Or macroeconomics. Microeconomics usually deal with individual entrepreneurs or small groups of individuals so is business on a much smaller scale.
Answer:
The payments will be of 1,797.02 dollars
Explanation:
We need tyo calcualte the PTM of an ordinary annuity which present value is 8,000. The time will be 5 years and the discount rate 4%
PV $8,000.00
time 5 years
rate 4% = 4/100 = 0.04
PTM: $ 1,797.017
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option A) contributory negligence .
Explanation:
The given above case where the CPA has responsibility of 20% in the fraud and company has 80% of the responsibility , then with the help of contributory negligence approach to liability , CPA would be able to avoid the liability completely .
Contributory negligence can be termed as the failure on the part of accuser ( plaintiffs ) to exercise a reasonable care of their safety. Here as per the universal law, the amount of compensation that plaintiff might receive would decrease if their actions have led to the increase in the likelihood of the incident .
