Answer:
B) diversity pairing
Explanation:
When people of different cultural backgrounds, sexes, races, are paired for mentoring, it is known as diversity pairing.
Answer:
E) None of the above
Explanation:
In partnership, the partners earn profit. The salary allowances are considered as though paid to a third party and are considered before arriving at the net income.
As such, given that net income is $30,000 and is to be shared in the ratio 80:20 between Gary and Elaine respectively.
Elaine's share = (20/100) × $30,000
= $6,000
Answer: Gwen should report a $3,000 long-term capital gain in her income tax return.
In this question the price paid by Gwen’s mother for the shares is irrelevant because of her death.
The stock’s fair market value ($20) when Gwen inherited the shares (21st October 2015) is Gwen stepped up value.
Gwen’s gain from selling the shares is:



Gwen inherited the shares on (21st October 2015) and held the shares until (3rd july 2017), so she held the shares for more than one year after inheriting it. So, she will report a long-term capital gain on her income tax return.
Answer:
$ 5.34
Explanation:
Calculation for cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs for September
First step is to find the Equivalent units of production
To complete beginning work-in-process:
Conversion 12,000
[15,000 units × (100%-20% )]
Units started and completed 65,000
(89,000-24,000)
Ending work-in-process
Conversion 21,600
(24,000 units × 90%)
Equivalent units of production 98,600
Second step is to calculate the Cost per equivalent unit using this formula
Cost per equivalent unit =Cost added during the period ÷Equivalent units of production
Let plug in the formula
Cost per equivalent unit = $526,524÷98,600
Cost per equivalent unit = $5.34
Therefore The cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs for September is closest to $ 5.34
Answer:
A. 14
Explanation:
the researcher claims that the width of the interval would have been smaller if the sample had been different, and in this case different refers to larger. The original sample included only 15 people, so in order to increase the data sample, you must include more than 15 people. That is why 14 doesn't make sense.