Answer:
A. must be more detailed for disclosures that involve fewer than 50 subject records.
Explanation:
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 was a bill enacted by the 104th U.S Congress and was signed in 1996 by President Bill Clinton. It is a federal law that protects sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without their knowledge, approval or consent and payment of health care insurance for employees.
For example, an employee or worker can receive health insurance from his or her former employer even after changing job because of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
When required, the information provided to the data subject in a HIPAA disclosure accounting must be more detailed for disclosures that involve fewer than 50 subject records.
Answer: B. The firm would install the filter at a cost of $ 300,000.
Explanation:
If the community owns the property rights, they would be able to demand that the firm pay the external cost of $500,000 per year.
If on the other hand the company installed a filter, it would cost them $300,000 but then they would not have to pay the community the $500,000.
The lower cost option would be to install the filter for $300,000 which is what the firm would do.
Answer: Not necessarily
Explanation:
Consumer purchase decisions are dependent on multiple factors such as price, income and preference. It could be that the customer purchased the Kia because the price was less than that of the Honda and so she wanted to save and costs and bought the less expensive choice.
It could also mean that the Kia was all she could afford based on her income so she bought that. It could however also mean that the Kia is her preference as compared to the Honda so she chose that instead.
It is therefore not a foregone conclusion that she bought the Kia simply because she preferred it. More information would be needed to reach that conclusion definitively.
Answer:
In my opinion Jack believes in the efficiency wage theory. This theory states that an increase in wages will increase labor productivity, lower staff turnover and attract the best possible employees.
So when Jack increases his employees' salaries, their increased productivity will recoup the extra labor costs. At the end, Jack believes his profit will increase because of the higher wages he pays.
