Answer:
i would find her not guilty but in most cases they would most find her not guilty and put her on a less charge. but i would say shes not gulity because the guy was breaking an entry Ms.urbanski was proberly was scared what might happen to her. and plus if she is an older women she proberly cant fight for her self even if she did an average man can most likely take down and average woman. i would also say that Ms.Urbanski didnt know if he had a gun or not so her life could of been in danger and lastly if Ms.Urbanski had a clear criminal record which would make this her first incident this could save her from being convicted
Explanation:
True , they can’t judge someone off of color & they need to learn who is who & we are all human
Answer: Yes, by serving on the repair shop a subpoena requiring that the shop produce the documents for inspection
Explanation:
You didn't provide the options but I got the options online.
The driver can obtain the truck's service records from the repair shop by serving on the repair shop a subpoena requiring that the shop produce the documents for inspection.
A subpoena simply means a written order that is used to compel someone to give testimony regarding a subject usually before a court. For the request of documents from parties, a request for production will be used while the nonparties require subpoenas.
Answer:
The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973). The Miller test faced its greatest challenge with online obscenity cases. In Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), a case challenging the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act, several justices questioned the constitutionality of applying the local community standards of Miller to speech on the Internet. In this photo, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU Ann Beeson gestures during a news conference outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 in Washington. The ACLU claimed COPA violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. They challenged the law on behalf of online bookstores, artists and others, including operators of Web sites that offer explicit how-to sex advice or health information. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that COPA did not pass the strict scrutiny test used to judge obscenity cases. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, used with permission from the Associated Press)
Explanation:
d
Answer:
Lawyers sometimes overestimate the likelihood of meeting their goals (like acquittal) and also of their ability to "read" jurors.
Explanation:
hope this helps
