1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olasank [31]
2 years ago
6

3.) Into what category does modern punishment theory fit?

Law
1 answer:
Gennadij [26K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or "deter," future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.

You might be interested in
What goal did the convention keep in mind during their discussions?
vova2212 [387]
<h2>Answer</h2>

To revise the article of Confederation.

<h2> hope it goes well </h2>

3 0
3 years ago
The Innocence Project, founded in 1992, uses newly discovered DNA testing and other investigation to uncover new evidence in cri
iragen [17]
The Innocence Project's groundbreaking use of DNA technology to free innocent people has provided irrefutable proof that wrongful convictions are not isolated or rare events but instead arise from systemic defects. give brainliest! x
7 0
3 years ago
What is evidence-based criminology? How does the meaning of the word evidence in evidence-based criminology differ from the evid
Vesna [10]
Can you show me a picture of your work, or maybe use brainly’s quick answers
7 0
3 years ago
Is it true or false that the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to try certain cases, in addition to its havi
victus00 [196]
Yes, I presume it’s True.

Explanation:
I don’t have a lot of experience with these questions although I did some research and found that according to the exact wording of Article III, Section 2, states: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” This I presume means the they did have original jurisdiction? Furthermore, if I think about this logically then, would they not be in charge of certain cases that might be severe or important that they wouldn’t let others know or help in?

I presume the answer is yes although you can choose anything you assume is correct. Btw I hope I helped a bit. Good luck!
6 0
4 years ago
How does Article III protect the political rights of judges? Of individuals?
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Texas is one of only a few states that elect judges in partisan elections. It has been suggested that perhaps this is not an app
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following constitutional rights was Leonard
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!
    12·1 answer
  • All jurors have the right to interpret the law as they see fit.<br> O True<br> O False
    5·2 answers
  • Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress was unable to fix the economy because it did not have the power to regulate inflat
    8·2 answers
  • Five (5) grounds upon which the Registrar can lawfully refuse to register a partnership
    5·1 answer
  • Fundamentals of Laws &amp; Codes - Assessment III
    15·1 answer
  • Systematic searching is a skill that takes ________ to master.
    12·2 answers
  • In the 1930’s, FDR expanded the federal government’s power through New Deal legislation. This changed the nature of American Fed
    5·1 answer
  • Plssssssssss hurry and answer for me hurrrrry
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!