Answer:
the question is missing the numbers, so I looked for a similar question:
Suppose you receive $100 at the end of each year for the next three years. a. If the interest rate is 8%, what is the present value of these cash flows? (Answer: $257) b. What is the future value in three years of the present value you computed in (a)? (Answer: $324.61) c. Suppose you deposit the cash flows in a bank account that pays 8% interest per year. What is the balance in the account at the end of each of the next three years (after your deposit is made)? How does the final bank balance compare with your answer in (b)?
a) PV = $100/1.08 + $100/1.08² + $100/1.08³ = $257.71
b) FV = $257.71 x (1 + 8%)³ = $324.64
c) FV = ($100 x 1.08²) + ($100 x 1.08) + $100 = $324.64
it is exactly the same as the answer for (b)
The accounting method under which revenues<span> are recognized on the income statement when they are earned.</span>
Answer:
Daniel’s team had to decide the vendor on the following attributes that should be analyzed:
- Innovation :- Credit Issue Group is a money related assistance organization and henceforth the seller needs to have a decent mechanical base to furnish with organization with required administrations on schedule and best in quality.
- Exclusivity: Considering the significance of the administrations, organization may take a gander at the restrictiveness of the administrations that merchant can offer to Credit Issue.
-
Complimentary Services offering:- To look if seller has some other contributions to make to the customer that might be complimentary with the fundamental administrations advertised. This can save money on schedule and authoritative work.
-
Support:- What support would vendor be able to offer to the organization alongside giving the essential administrations.
-
Contingency:- in case of seller's framework disappointment, what back up merchant needs to proceed with uninterrupted administrations.
Ksksjisndjdjdismjwkwmsjxjsjsx
Answer:
Misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In this scenario, on its advertisement, a company claims that it has funds in its possession that are in fact not available for payment of losses or claims. The company is guilty of misrepresentation.
Misrepresentation can be defined as an untrue or misleading statement of fact made by a party to an individual or group of people to deceitfully lure or induce them to go into a contract. A company stating in its advert that it has funds in its possession but in the true sense or actual fact do not have the funds for payment of losses or claims; such a company is engaging in a fraudulent act and is liable to prosecution in any court of competent jurisdiction.
