Find the decimal equivalent of each and then put in order.
Steve 130 5/6= 130.83333
Riley 130 2/3= 130.66666
Nikolas 130.5
Carrie 130 7/12= 130.58333
Jorja 130.25
Now that they each have a decimal equivalent, we can put them in order from greatest to least.
Steve 130 5/6= 130.83333
Riley 130 2/3= 130.66666
Carrie 130 7/12= 130.58333
Nikolas 130.5
Jorja 130.25
ANSWER: A) Steve, Riley, Carrie, Nikolas, Jorja
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
(-3,8)
Step-by-step explanation:
When reflecting over the y-axis, you are switching from positive to negative x-values. Since 3 was already positive, we change the integer and in this case, to negative, so it becomes -3. Since the y value remains the same we don’t change the 8. So (-3,8)
I hope this helps!
Please give thanks or brainliest if this helps!
<span>We cannot deduce about the exact location of P between J and K. But we can conclude: segment JP + segment PK = line JK.
</span><span>JP + PK = JK.
</span><span>Substitute first each.
(8z - 17) + (5z + 37) = 17z - 4
Combine like terms.
13z + 20 = 17z - 4
Isolate the variable z.
4z = 24
z = 6
The value of the variable z is then 6 units.</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Population Mean = 7.1
sample size = 24
Sample mean = 7.3
Standard deviation = 1.0
Level of significance = 0.025
The null hypothesis:
The alternative hypothesis:
This test is right-tailed.
Rejection region: at ∝ = 0.025 and df of 23, the critical value of the right-tailed test 
The test statistics can be computed as:
t = 0.980
Decision rule:
Since the calculated value of t is lesser than, i.e t = 0.980 < , then we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to claim that the population mean is greater than 7.1 at 0.025 level of significance.
425(4)= 1700. After 4 months they would have lost $1700
