Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If you divide by 4 (both numerator and denominator)
You get which is equivalent to the given ration
3 How is the value of 2 - 3 like the value of 3 - 2? How is it different? -
1 answer:
Answer:
They are not diffrent at all. may look diffrent from the question but lets look a little closer!
Step-by-step explanation:
2-3=1 and 3-2=1 both answers look the same because the equion is Both 3s in 3-2 and 2-3 looks no diffrent. To be honest one is only backwords from the other one! But remeber to think BIG and look at those diffrentses.
You might be interested in
Answer:
Karen had 45 m and m's candy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of m and m's candy be 'x'.
Now given:
Karen gave an equal amount of m and m's to herself and four friends.
So we can say that;
Number of people m and m's candy distributed equally = 5
Also Given:
Each person receives m and m's equivalent to the largest one digit number.
Now we know that;
Largest one digit number is 9.
So we can say that;
Each person receives m and m's = 9
We need to find number of m and m's Karen have.
Solution:
So we can say that;
Total number of m and m's Karen have is equal to Number of people m and m's candy distributed equally multiplied by number of m and m's can each person receives.
framing in equation form we get;
Total number of m and m's Karen had =
Hence Karen had 45 m and m's candy.
Based on the reflexive property of congruency, the missing step in the proof is: A. ∠ABC ≅ ∠DBE
<h3>What is the Reflexive Property of Congruency?</h3>The reflexive property of congruency states that an angle will always be congruent to itself.
In the diagram given, we can prove that ∠ABC ≅ ∠DBE based on the reflexive property.
Therefore, the missing step in nthe proof is: A. ∠ABC ≅ ∠DBE
Learn more about reflexive property on:
#SPJ4
