I think both, my reasons are, first, we have more technology and better transportation that will help us, like the technology to take and give to others, and the cars and trains ect. to help us to get from one place to another a bit quicker. Also i think worse because of the green house causes, the cars,oil,and other things we use in our everyday life is slowly ruining the planet, ecosystem ect. there are downsides and upsides to both.
Answer:
A resposta correta é A. reconheça a raiva deles e deixe-os compartilhar um pouco com você.
Answer:
Answer for the question
Some observers had argued that Uber’s greatest problem was not any of its scandals, but its CEO Travis Kalanick. Now that Kalanick no longer serves that role, how much better off is Uber really? Where do you come down? Do you think Kalanick’s reduced profile will turn the tide for Uber? Or is Kalanick’s drive and competitiveness necessary to Uber’s continued success, regardless of the title he holds? If you were on the board, what would you recommend? And why?
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Spending variance will be equal to -729
Explanation:
We have given wages and salary is $2060 per month plus $442 per birth
We have given total number of birth = 117
So standard cost = $2060+117×$442 = $53774
Actual wages and salary for the month is = $54500
We have to find the spending variance
Spending variance is given by
Spending variance = Standard cost - actual cost = $53774 - $54500 = -729
So spending variance will be equal to -729
The government is an consumer because they trade with other countries to get goods that their country need and they are also a producer because they produce strategies for their government to make our communities around the world more better and advanced.
