The audit expectation gap is caused by unrealistic user expectations. The auditors provides reasonable gap examples that would not be included in unrealistic user expectations.
NASBA believes the expectancy gap relating to fraud and going problems in a financial statement audit may be caused by a few factors: lack of knowledge by way of the general public as to what an audit is and what auditors do; inconsistent audit execution in these regions by some auditors due to lack of expertise.
The expectation hole exists while auditors and the public keep distinct beliefs about the auditors' obligations and obligations and the messages conveyed by way of audit reports. apparently, there's an opening between what the public expects and what it virtually receives.
Learn more about auditors here: brainly.com/question/26048609
#SPJ4
Answer:
Jacobsen Corporation
Income from continuing operations of $621,000 will be reported.
Explanation:
The income from continuing operations is the same thing as the operating income. It is the pre-tax income that is reported on Jacobsen Corporation's income statement for the year ended December 31, 2016. The tax rate of 30% is applied on this figure to obtain the income tax expense for the year. But, for Jacobsen that has other unusual items, these are taken into consideration before the income tax is imputed to obtain the after-tax income.
Answer:
Infrastructure as a service
Explanation:
Answer:
Breaking through the stress in the room
Answer:
Yes because a person with a lower income may tend to spend a greater share of his income on gasoline
Explanation:
For example, if a low income individual earning $1000 and a high-income person who earns $2000 each purchase 12 gallons of gasoline, the taxes on this purchase will consume a larger portion of the low-income person’s earnings than that of the high-income person. Assuming a tax rate of 5% of earnings multiplied by 12 Gallons.
Low income individual earnings after tax deductions= $400
High income individual earnings after tax deductions= $800
