Answer:
I D am going on the day of I have to have a my time life and for that my day is not going so I fast for and I will be not able to
Explanation:
D I for the my love life and is going not that to be my life for you guys to do this that I is going to through you this time and I am very excited about about this opportunity and I am I to be to you my understanding is the best same for here as in the this year I have been in busy with and in I still have a lot going to work on my life and my I
<u>Answer:</u> The decisions to ban and then reinstate eligibility in the Oscar Pistorius case raises questions about the "process through which deviance is defined in sports".
<u>Explanation:</u>
South African athlete Oscar Pistorius was on court charged with the murder of his 29-year-old model and law graduate girlfriend named Reeva Steenkamp at his home in Pretoria on 14 February 2013.
Pistorius is a leading South African runner and gained recognition as a high-level athlete with a disability, including several Paralympic Games and the 2012 Summer Olympics.
The judgment given by the Judge named Thokozile Masipa that Pistorius was not guilty of murder but guilty of Steenkamp's culpable homicide (unlawful killing of a person with or without intent to kill, depending on how the crime has been defined by a particular jurisdiction).
Soon after Pistorius was banned by sports authority, his arrest and later imprisonment was big shock among media and people. But later his eligibility was reinstated which raised questions about the "process through which deviance is defined in sports" and opposed by many people.
Answer:
Canada first was colonized by the French and the United States originally was colonized by the English. ... Lower Canada was under the influence of France and adopted the French culture and language. The Upper and Lower regions were united in 1867 to form one Canada.
Explanation:
It was primarily the gold-minders themselves that took the law into their own hands during the Gold Rush. Laws in these territories were very loosely established and easily avoidable.
In that case, the state of South Dakota did not agree to the federal congressional law that only people of 21 and older are allowed to drink as they allowed 19 year-olds and older to purchase beer if it's up until the 3.2% of alcohol limit in it. The supreme court declared that the law of 21 is constitutional and that South Dakota can't object and have it's own laws, and declared that if the state does not conform to the laws, they would lose federal funding.
