There really is no single "obvious" choice here...
Possibly the sequence is periodic, with seven copies of -1 followed by six copies of 0, or perhaps seven -1s and seven 0s. Or maybe seven -1s, followed by six 0s, then five 1s, and so on, but after a certain point it would seem we have to have negative copies of a number, which is meaningless.
Or maybe it's not periodic, and every seventh value in the sequence is incremented by 1? Who knows?
I'll go ahead and assume the latter case, that the sequence is not periodic, since that's technically somewhat easier to manage. We can assign the following rule to the

-th term in the sequence:


for

.
So the generating function for this sequence might be

As to what is meant by "closed form", I'm not sure. Would this answer be acceptable? Or do you need to find a possibly more tractable form for the coefficient not in terms of the floor function?
Answer:
H0 is accepted
there is no difference between the proportions of Indian and Asian young people who listen to rap music every day.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given a sample survey compared 634 randomly chosen Indians aged 15 to 25 with 567 randomly selected Asians in the same age group.

It found that 368 of the Indians and 130 Asians listened to rap music every day.

Null hypothesis H0: there is no difference between the proportions of Indian and Asian young people who listen to rap every day.

Alternative hypothesis:- 
Level of significance α = 0.05
The test of statistic

where 
p = 0.414
and q = 1-p = 1- 0.414 =0.586

on calculation , we get
z = 0.300 ><1.96 at 95 % level of significance
H0 is accepted
there is no difference between the proportions of Indian and Asian young people who listen to rap every day.
Answer:
<u>8 hits</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio is :
- hits : times-at-bat = 4 : 9
Now, we have 18 times at bat.
Multiply both sides of the ratio with 2 :
- 4 x 2 hits : 9 x 2 times at bat
- <u>8 hits</u> : 18 times at bat
Harry should make <u>8 hits</u> in 18 times at bat.