A written opinion of the supreme court is best described as the court's ruling on the issue presented, its reasoning, and applicable law. In some courts such as the supreme court of the united states, the majority opinion may be broken down into numbered or lettered sections. This permits judges who compose an opinion in agreement in part or disobedient in part to easily classify which parts they join with the mainstream. Opinions may also be distributed in ways that limit the amount of authority that they have as precedents for future cases. In united states legal run through, a memorandum opinion or memorandum judgement is an opinion that does not make instance of any kind. A memorandum opinion may be distributed where the law is so clearly distinct that no resolution would be aided by issuing an details as to why the law requires a certain character of the case before the court. In appellate courts a memorandum opinion may stipulate that the judges hearing the appeal find no error in the opinion being interested to be worthy of comment.
Mostly for travel and trade purposes. They had to alter them to get through or across them.
Women in Sumerian society had much more rights than those in later Babylonian, Akkadian, and Assyrian cultures. Women could own property, run businesses with their husbands, become scribes or physicians, and serve as a witness or a judge in court. The rise of polytheistic religions also gave women roles as priestesses, as goddesses were worshipped as much as gods.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
It is important for the Civil Service to be politically neutral for a lot of reasons, one of which is:
Civil servants must be non-partisan: this implies that, since different government with different ideologies and personal comes and go, it is therefore necessary for civil servants not just for their own interest, but for the interest of continuity and general citizens at large, must serve whoever is the elected government of the day without being bias. This also involves, being responsible and responsive, in total commitment to the government’s policies.
The answer is "European American wives".
Gottman and Leveson found about European American spouses and African American couples about separation that they use more accommodating and less destructive and quiet withdrawal behaviors over time which shows that they are searching for approaches to defuse strife and are working through troublesome issues all the more viably. These finding clarify why the chances for separate are higher prior in marriage: couples wedded for shorter circumstances are less ready to bargain viably with strife.
