Answer:
Civil Liberties Supreme Court
Explanation:
From what I can tell, the case would likely be sent to a Civil Liberties Court where either a pannel of judges or a jury (might wish to look that up to be sure), would decide whether rights were in conflict, and if they were, how to resolve said conflict.
Answer:
A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract
Explanation:
The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.
I think the answer would be d
<span>The author, Ron Chernow, presents Hamilton as an overly ambitious man but his ambitions were motivated not by egocentric deeds but by passion and determination to build the foundations of American success and prosperity. Clearly, his actions were influenced by ambition and not by principle. This is expressed in one example as written by Chernow, “To repudiate his legacy.” Another is “in many ways, to repudiate the modern world.” </span>
Answer:
rx3rerwrtrfasdfdfadfadfadfdfqer
Explanation:
werwer
