Answer:
size constancy
Explanation:
Size constancy: In psychology, the term size constancy is defined as the phenomenon that explains an individual's perception related to the size of a particular object is considered as relatively constant irrespective of the size of that object changes or varies largely on the retina of a person with distance.
Example: An individual will perceive a ball having a constant size irrespective of the distance he or she is standing.
In the question above, the given statement represents the size constancy.
Contrary to popular belief, Africa's civil wars are not due to its ethnic and
religious diversity. Using recently developed models of the overall prevalence of
civil wars in 161 countries between 1960-1999, we draw lessons with special
reference to Africa, showing that the relatively higher prevalence of war in Africa
is not due to the ethno-linguistic fragmentation of its countries, but rather to high
levels of poverty, failed political institutions, and economic dependence on natural
resources. We argue that the best and fastest strategy to reduce the prevalence of
civil war in Africa and prevent future civil wars is to institute democratic reforms
that effectively manage the challenges facing Africa's diverse societies.
Sickness, climate, and insects caused troops to be withdrawn to SC in 1727, but they kept two lookouts at the fort until Oglethorpe arrived in Savannah in 1733.
The answer for this would be ALTRUISM. This is when someone shows a helping behavior voluntarily for the benefit of another person without expecting something in return. In short, this is showing selfless concern for others even if it means risking one's safety. Hope this helps.
<span> Judith Miller was a reporter for the New York
Times who wrote an article claiming that Iraq has nukes. The government used
Miller’s article to justify going to “war” (not really a war when it’s just one
side killing another). She claimed that Iraq is going to use the nuclear
weapons to hurt the American people, which made people, and rightfully so, fear
for their safety. After the US started the war (and got all the oil they
needed), they revealed that Iraq had no nuclear weapons, after all. The reporter, Judith Miller was put in jail
for a short while afterwards for not revealing her sources when she published the article; today, she is blamed by many people
to be part of the cause of the Iraq war.</span>
<span>
</span>
<span> People are continuously suggesting that the US finally leaves Iraq today, however that has not yet happened. A lot of people are in favor of the US leaving Iraq because enough is enough and the war going on there hasn't been doing anyone any good. The US has been losing a lot of money on the military spending and there has been a lot of loss of life on the Iraqi side, so it's not benefiting any side. Other people that oppose the US leaving Iraq mostly do it privately because they want to continue stealing Iraqi oil or because they genuinely believe that Iraq is still a threat. </span>
