Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 1/5 of the total distance to his grandmothers house was traveled on Sunday
The total distance to to his grandmothers house is assumed to be 1
Marks family traveled 7/10 of the distance to his grandmothers house on Saturday. The remaining distance would
1 - 7/10 = 3 /10
They traveled 2/3 of the remaining distance on Sunday. This means that the distance that they travelled on Sunday is
2/3 × 3/10 = 2/10 = 1/5
Answer:
We define the random variable X as the walking age and we are interested if American children learn to walk less than 15 months so then that would be the alternative hypothesis and the complement would be the null hypothesis.
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
And for this case the best answer would be:
H 0 : μ ≥ 15 vs. Ha : μ < 15
Step-by-step explanation:
We define the random variable X as the walking age and we are interested if American children learn to walk less than 15 months so then that would be the alternative hypothesis and the complement would be the null hypothesis.
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
And for this case the best answer would be:
H 0 : μ ≥ 15 vs. Ha : μ < 15
And the data given from the sample is:
represent the sample mean
represent the population deviation
represent the sample size
And the statistic would be given by:

Answer:
- y = -5x +10
- (0, 10)
- (1, 5)
- see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Subtract 5x from both sides to put the equation in slope-intercept form:
y = -5x +10
__
2. The y-intercept is the point corresponding to x=0. The y-value when x=0 is the constant in the equation: 10. Then the point is ...
(x, y) = (0, 10)
You may notice this is one of the points listed in part 4, and is also used in question 3.
__
3. The x-value computed is 1; the y-value computed is 5. The point is ...
(x, y) = (1, 5)
You may notice this is one of the points listed in part 4.
__
4. See attached
9514 1404 393
Answer:
D. 14
Step-by-step explanation:
Point G divides each median into parts that have the ratio ...
short : long = 1 : 2
Then ...
GD : GC = 1 : 2 = 7 : 14 . . . . . . . . multiply the ratio by 7
GC = 14
Your classmate's error about AB and DC being complimentary and parallel is that they misapplied the alternate angle property.
<h3>Why are AB and DC not parallel?</h3><h3 />
There isn't enough evidence presented in the diagram to say that AB and DC are parallel.
The evidence required would be proof that angle AWZ is equal to angle WZY.
Instead, all we have is that angle AWZ and angle XYC are equal which does not tell us what we need to know about AB and DC being parallel.
Find out more on properties of parallel lines at brainly.com/question/24607467
#SPJ1