In sonnet 130, the speaker is making fun of the conventional poetry in Elizabethan England. The sonnets of that time followed the Petrarchan style, using beautiful metaphors to praise an idealised female lover, admiring her beauty and her worth.
I think that writing this sonnet, Shakespeare is mocking a style that had already become cliché at that time. Also, I share the speakers attitude in the way that the idealization of a love interest in such manner, often leads to the creation of beauty standards that are far from the truth and can have negative consequences in the people trying to adhere to them.
Answer:
It poses a crucial inquiry about existence, passing, and resurrection. It's not altogether negative and desolate but rather is sincere in making inquiries about the truth of life. The subject spring sounds vivacious, as it speaks to new life, the resurrection of blossoms, rich leaves, greenery flourishing all around thus and the effective scent of verve.
Explanation:
Answer:
D). She is able to give an objective account of one part of Enrique's life.
Explanation:
The writing of Enrique's emotional journey in the form of a biography would help Sonia to 'be able to offer an objective account of one part of Enrique's life' as the readers would themselves be able to relate to his experiences and sympathize him.
If she had not opted for a biographical portrayal of his journey, she could have been considered biased and the audience could not relate to him that impactfully and the intended response might not come out. Thus, opting for a biographical form allows her to offer an unbiased account of his journey and elicit natural responses and feelings from the audience. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
