If the American colonists were allowed more control and representation in they British government they most likely would've been satisfied and wouldn't have started a revolution. If there wasn't a revolution the United States might've still been part of Britain today.
Answer
Yes it affects gender inequality
Explanation:
This is due to the fact that patriarchy is common in Ghana and Africa as a whole and it involves the male gender being generally accepted as the dominant force in all spheres of life. This is as a result of their traditions and custom beliefs making a provision for that. This makes the female gender answerable to the male gender and the male gender also tends to asserts some authority and power which makes the women vulnerable.
Answer:
C) the representativeness heuristic.
Explanation:
Representativeness heuristic: In psychology, the term representativeness heuristic is referred to as the phenomenon which involves categorizing or organizing different objects based on the object's similarity assessment and within the category prototype, for example, cause and effects complement each other. The representativeness heuristic involves an easy computation and therefore referred to as a mental shortcut.
In the question above, the given statement represents the powerful influence of the representativeness heuristic.
Answer:
e. social responsibility
Explanation:
Social responsibility: The term "social responsibility" is described as one of the ethical theories whereby an individual is considered as accountable for carrying out his or her "civic duty" i.e, the actions or behaviors of an individual needs to benefit a specific society as a whole. However, thorough this way a balance should be maintained between the welfare of the environment & the society and the economic growth.
In the question above, Anheuser-Busch is exhibiting social responsibility.
<span>Slavery in the Spanish American colonies</span> was an economic and social institution central to the operations of the Spanish Empire - it bound Africans and indigenous people to a relationship of colonial exploitation. The Spanish colonists provided the Americas with a colonial precedent for slavery and influenced the development of modern racial ideologies, such as limpieza de sangre. Early on, however, opposition from the enslaved and from influential Spaniards moved the Crown to limit the bondage of indigenous people, and initiated debates that challenged the idea of slavery based on race. Spaniards regarded some indigenous people as tribute under the encomienda system during the late 1400s and part of the 1500s.[1]
Spanish slavery in the Americas did not diverge drastically from that in other European colonies. It reshuffled the Atlantic World's populations through forced migrations, helped transfer American wealth to Europe, and promoted racial and social hierarchies (castas) throughout the empire.[2] Spanish enslavers justified their wealth and status earned at the expense of captive workers by portraying them as inferior beings and holding them as personal properties (chattel slavery), often under barbarous conditions.[3] In fact, Spanish colonization set some egregious records in the field of slavery.[4] The Asiento, the official contract for trading in slaves in the vast Spanish territories was a major engine of the Atlantic slave trade. When Spain first enslaved Native Americans on Hispaniola, and then replaced them with captive Africans, it established unfree labor as the basis for colonial mass-production. The tale of Spanish exploits in the Americas, amplified for propagandistic reasons, earned such notoriety that European rivals called it the Black Legend. And in the mid-nineteenth century, as most countries in the hemisphere moved to disallow chattel slavery, Cuba and Puerto Rico - the last two remaining Spanish American colonies - maintained slavery the longest.[a]<span>[5]</span>
<span>
</span>
