I think the most accurate answer would be D- Getting in a fight
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
Issues of this payphone
Explanation:
The payphone has no records of who called. The workers don't recall there being a payphone.
