I more or less have an understanding, but,
Factor out the GCF of 4x-3 from 5(4x-3)+x(4x-3)
Making it,
(4x-3)(5+x)
Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
g=0.04 times d
Step-by-step explanation:
if you multiply 0.04 with every number under the d column then you’ll get the outcome of each number under g
Electronegativity<span> is a measure of the tendency of an atom to attract a bonding pair of electrons. The Pauling scale is the most commonly used. Fluorine (the most</span>electronegative<span> element) is assigned a value of 4.0, and values range down to caesium and francium which are the least </span>electronegative<span> at 0.7.</span>
I^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 then the square cancels out so the answer is just
-1
