All categories

2 years ago

Ment in

Mathematics

1 answer:

ASHA 777 [7]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

ment in

jate itsment in

jate its

Fledge to

arlier ruling

Which of the following did you include in your

answer? Check all of the boxes that apply.

I summarized the coument in

jate its

Fledge to

arlier ruling

Which of the following did you include in your

answer? Check all of the boxes that apply.

I summarized the court's argument.

I identified the premises and conclusion.

I analyzed the premises supporting the

decision.

I evaluated the arguments supporting the

decision.

I included background knowledge.

I recognized that the Constitution takes on

different meanings as societal values

changert's argument.

I identified the premises and conclusion.

I analyzed the premises supporting the

decision.

I evaluated the arguments supporting the

decision.

I included background knowledge.

I recognized that the Constitution takes on

different meanings as societal values

change

Fledge to

arlier ruling

Which of the following did you include in your

answer? Check all of the boxes that apply.

I summarized the court's argument.

I identified the premises and conclusion.

I analyzed ment in

jate its

Fledge to

arlier ruling

Which of the following did you include in your

answer? Check all of the boxes that apply.

I summarized the court's argument.

I identified the premises and conclusion.

I analyzed the premises supporting the

decision.

I evaluated the arguments supporting the

decision.

I included background knowledge.

I recognized that the Constitution takes on

different meanings as societal values

changement in

jate its

Fledge to

arlier ruling

Which of the following did you include in your

answer? Check all of the boxes that apply.

I summarized the court's argment in

jate its

Fledge to

arlier ruling

Which of the following did you include in your

answer? Check all of the boxes that apply.

I summarized the court's argument.

I identified the premises and conclusion.

I analyzed the premises supporting the

decision.

I evaluated the arguments supporting the

decision.

I included background knowledge.

I recognized that the Constitution takes on

different meanings as societal values

changeument.

I identified the premises and conclusion.

I analyzed the premises supporting the

decision.

I evaluated the arguments supporting the

decision.

I included background knowledge.

I recognized that the Constitution takes on

different meanings as societal values

changethe premises supporting the

decision.

I evaluated the arguments supporting the

decision.

I included background knowledge.

I recognized that the Constitution takes on

different meanings as societal values

change

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

You return from a trip with 480 Canadian dollars. How much are your Canadian dollars worth in U.S. dollars? Use the exchange rat

Sever21 [200]

591 Dollars 42 Cents (591 Dollars when rounded)

6 0

3 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

HURRY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

chubhunter [2.5K]

If you separate the triangles, you'll notice that both are literally the same triangle because all angles are the same.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two angles are complementary if the sum of their measures is 90°. Find two complementary angles such that one of the angles is 1

Burka [1]

Bro that's a lot, i don't know what the heck you are talking about.

4 0

3 years ago

Identify is this is percent increase or percent decrease, then calculate percentage

vlabodo [156]

<em>Last year the chess club had 30 members. This year the club has 24 members. </em>

Last year, the chess club had 30 members. This year, the club has 24 members. Since this year had less than last year ( 30 > 24), the percent will be decreasing.

To find the percent decrease, you have to use the following formula.

$\frac{Difference}{Original} \times 100$

Difference refers to the difference between the two numbers, 24 and 30. The difference between 24 and 30 is 6. Original refers to the original number, which is last year's amount of members in the chess group. Therefore, original = 30.

Substitute the numbers into the formula.

$\frac{Difference}{Original} =\frac{6}{30} =0.2$

To convert the decimal to a fraction, multiply the decimal by 100.

$0.2 \times 100 = 20 \%$

The answer is the number of chess members decreased by 20%.

____

Since I started off by identifying whether it was decreasing or increasing, I did the work a bit differently. When finding the difference, you would usually subtract 30 from 24, which results in -6. Above I used 6, but if you used -6, you would end up with a result of -20%, which means it decreased by 20%. They bot end up with the same result, but you don't always have to first identify whether it's decreasing or increasing.

____

3 0

3 years ago