1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
2 years ago
6

Ms. Bosman writes that the verdict is being seen by some as “a win for the notion of self-defense” and others as “a failure of t

he criminal justice system.” Do you think this verdict should be seen as a symbol for broader issues? If so, which ones? If not, why?
Law
1 answer:
nika2105 [10]2 years ago
5 0

The acquittal of Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two men and wounded another in a <em>riot against the killing</em> of Jacob Blake, who was protesting the police brutality against George Floyd, can only be seen as a symbol of America's racial divide.

The question is, was Mr. Rittenhouse right to carry a gun at 17 years when he was attending to keep the peace and provide medical aid to protesters? At his age then, was Mr. Rittenhouse authorized to belong to a Vigilante Group that could keep the peace in racial protests?

Thus, given Mr. Rittenhouse's age and the purpose of his presence at the scene of rioting, the verdict that acquitted him is bound to attract controversy concerning broader issues of <em>vigilantism, gun rights,</em><em> and proper definition of </em><em>self-defense</em>.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/25716779

You might be interested in
In what way did Sir William Garrow have a huge effect on the American legal system?
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

C. He insisted on the right of the accused to have a defense lawyer.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
Greeley [361]

Answer:

WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO WEE WOO

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Why did people protesting the stay-at-home order cite the 2nd amendment? Isn't that the right to bear arms?
Katen [24]

Answer:

the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.

Explanation:

they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
If someone is seriously injured in a collision, what should you do?
Eddi Din [679]
Call 911 immediately
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following are benefits of being a judge?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

A. State court Judges serve lifetime appointments.

Explanation:

Article 3 of the US constitution

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the constitution say
    5·1 answer
  • What new information did you learn about the 2020 debate?
    15·1 answer
  • Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices?
    10·2 answers
  • Help what is two plus two please
    9·2 answers
  • The secondary market and participants provide stability for home financing in what way
    12·1 answer
  • Note that most projection pages include other important races being voted on today. Why do those races matter? What are the larg
    7·2 answers
  • How has the confirmation power change reflected<br> political trends in American government?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help taking exam right now will give brainless!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • Guess the anime character by their voice lines:<br> 1)SHINEEEEEE<br> 2)Datebayo
    8·1 answer
  • IF YOU WANT TO TURN LEFT FROM A DRIVEWAY ONTO A ROAD WITH A
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!